Towards the Semantics of Content Questions in Yorùbá

Authors

  • Ọlaide Akinwande University of Lagos, Akọka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60787/jolan.vol29no1.457

Keywords:

Alternative Semantics, Content Questions, Information Structure, Semantics, Yorùbá
         Abtract Views | PDF Download: 26 / 26

Abstract

Although syntactic studies on Yorùbá content questions abound, their semantic aspects remain understudied. To address this gap, this paper examines the semantics of Yorùbá content questions, focusing specifically on in-situ content question constructions. Drawing data from spontaneous speech, it constructs pragmatic contexts to account for their specific interpretations. Framed within Information Structure (Chafe, 1976; Prince, 1981; Halliday, 1994; Lambrecht, 1994; Erteschik-Shir, 2007; van der Wal et al., 2025) and Alternative Semantics (Hamblin, 1973; Karttunen, 1977; Rooth, 1992, 2015), the analysis captures both the structural composition and semantic interpretations of in-situ content questions. The paper identify three distinct semantic construals: clarity, assurance, and amazement/displeasure. Additionally, it re-evaluates Jones’s (2006) claim that verb or VP focus cannot answer wh-questions in Yorùbá. It demonstrates that while Jones’s conclusions hold for restricted content questions, verb or VP focus cleanly answers unrestricted content questions. It concludes with the suggestion that future research should extend this semantic analysis to ex-situ content questions.

Author Biography

Ọlaide Akinwande, University of Lagos, Akọka

 

 

 

 

References

Aboh, E. O. (2010). The phonology-syntax interface. In E. O. Aboh & J. Essegbey (Eds.), Topics in Kwa syntax (pp. 41–68). Springer.

Aboh, E. O., & Pfau, R. (2011). What’s a wh-item got to do with it? Oxford University Press.

Adeoye, J. A. (2018). The structure of negation in Úwù. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 39, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.17161/KWPL.1808.27150

Akerele, T. (2021). Corpus approach to the typology of content questions in Yorùbá. African Journal of Language Research, 3(1–2), 44–62.

Ariel, M. (2000). Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 29–87). John Benjamins.

Bamgbóṣé, A. (1990). Fọnọ́ lọ́ jì àti gírámà Yorùbá. University Press.

Bobaljik, J. D., & Wurmbrand, S. (2015). Questions with declarative syntax tell us what about selection? In J. G. Angel & O. Dennis (Eds.), 50 years later: Reflections on Chomsky’s Aspects (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 77, pp. 13–32). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Cable, S. (2010). The grammar of Q: Q-particles, wh-movement, and pied-piping. Oxford University Press.

Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). Academic Press.

Chang, Q. (2016). Wh-question constructions in Colloquial Singapore English [Doctoral dissertation, National University of Singapore]. National University of Singapore Scholar Bank.

Cheng, L. L.-S. (1991). On the typology of wh-questions [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. MIT Libraries Digital Repository.

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.

Déchaine, R.-M. (2001). On the left edge of Yorùbá complements. Lingua, 111(2), 81–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00026-6

Erteschik-Shir, N. (2007). Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface. Oxford University Press.

Faure, R., & Palasis, K. (2021). Exclusivity! Wh-fronting is not optional wh-movement in Colloquial French. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 39(1), 57–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-020-09472-y

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

Gundel, J. K. (2003). Cognitive status, information structure, and pronominal reference to causally introduced entities. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 12(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024107122851

Gunlogson, C. (2003). True to form: Rising and falling declaratives as questions in English. Routledge.

Hagstrom, P. (1998). Decomposing questions [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. MIT Libraries Digital Repository.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.Hamblin, C. L. (1973). Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language, 10(1), 41–53.

Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Ilọri, J. F. (2010). Nominal constructions in Igálà and Yorùbá [Doctoral dissertation, Adekunle Ajasin University].

Ilọri, J. F. (2017). Interrogative projections in Yoruboid languages. Journal of West African Languages, 44(1), 1–17.

Jones, S. (2006). Focus in Yorùbá: A semantic/pragmatic account. Papers in Linguistics, 46(8), 143–160.

Karttunen, L. (1977). Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1(1), 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351935

Kiss, É. K. (1998). Identificational focus versus information focus. Language, 74(2), 245–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/417867

Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press.

Olaogun, S. (2017). On the so-called interrogative nouns in Yorùbá. Journal of the Linguistic Association of Nigeria, 20(1), 243–247.

Ọlaogun, S. (2018). Yes/no and wh-questions in Ǹjò-kóó: A unified analysis. Corela, 16(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4000/corela.6562

Oṣhodi, B. (2016). Question formation and focus construction in Ọ̀wọ̀ : A Yorùbá dialect. Macro Linguistics, 4(4), 126–142.

Potts, C. (2005). The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford University Press.

Prince, A. S. (1981). Toward a theory of feature structure in phonology. Indiana University Linguistics Club.

Roberts, C. (2012). Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics, 5, Article 6, 1–69. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.5.6Rooth, M. (1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1(1), 75–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617

Rooth, M. (1996). Focus. In S. Lappin (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory (pp. 271–297). Blackwell.

Rooth, M. (2015). Replication data for alternative semantics [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/29845

Sudo, Y. (2013). Biased polar questions in English and Japanese. In D. Gutzmann & H.-M. Gärtner (Eds.), Beyond expressives: Explorations in use-conditional meaning (pp. 275–295). Brill.

van der Wal, J. (2025). On the expression of information structure in Bantu. Leiden University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-06

How to Cite

Akinwande, Ọlaide. (2026). Towards the Semantics of Content Questions in Yorùbá. Journal of The Linguistic Association of Nigeria, 29(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.60787/jolan.vol29no1.457

Issue

Section

Articles